| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
| Date: | 2006-09-10 00:46:49 |
| Message-ID: | C214100E-078E-4F8E-A9EE-44860F02FA7F@seespotcode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 10, 2006, at 5:21 , Tom Lane wrote:
> In the category of "egad", I found out that the tinterval datatype
> uses
> << for "contains"! This is simply bizarre --- whether you approve of
> the inet-like notation or not, surely the arrows are pointing the
> wrong
> way. Given that tinterval is deprecated and not even documented,
> maybe
> this isn't worth fixing. Any thoughts?
I'd say leave tinterval as it is. If it's ever updated to use the
modern time types (rather than abstime), that would be a logical time
to change it, it seems to me.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-10 00:58:54 | Re: TODO item: GUID |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-10 00:41:59 | Re: ISBN/ISSN/ISMN/EAN13 module |