| From: | "Schnabel, Robert D(dot)" <schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: When does CLUSTER occur? | 
| Date: | 2012-11-29 17:42:46 | 
| Message-ID: | C20A71F48B88EF419C0DC4A5514984462814B5@UM-MBX-N03.um.umsystem.edu | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Janes [mailto:jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Schnabel, Robert D.
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] When does CLUSTER occur?
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Schnabel, Robert D.
<schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu> wrote:
> My question is whether or not the "ALTER TABLE gen1011 CLUSTER ON 
> xgen1011_si_sn" actually clusters the table at that point or if it 
> just tells it to use that index for clustering?
It just marks it to use that index if/when it is clustered, it doesn't do the clustering.
Cheers,
Jeff
[Schnabel, Robert D.]  
That's what I thought because I just went through this exercise for another table which was previously clustered.  The correlation on the column for the index was 1.  After I did the drop index, insert data, create index with the cluster command the correlation was <1.
Thanks for the clarification.
Bob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Christensen | 2012-11-29 17:43:27 | Re: When does CLUSTER occur? | 
| Previous Message | Shaun Thomas | 2012-11-29 17:41:44 | Re: youtube video on pgsql integrity |