From: | Sreejith P <sreejith(at)lifetrenz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suddenly all queries moved to seq scan |
Date: | 2024-11-20 14:08:49 |
Message-ID: | C1F257F9-4CFE-4CC8-A6BB-E66F150CEF8D@lifetrenz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 20 Nov 2024, at 6:32 PM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 20 Nov 2024, at 11:50, Sreejith P <sreejith(at)lifetrenz(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> We are using PostgresQL 10 in our production database. We have around 890 req /s request on peak time.
>
> PostgreSQL 10 is well out of support and does not receive bugfixes or security
> fixes, you should plan a migration to a supported version sooner rather than
> later.
>
>> 2 days back we applied some patches in the primary server and restarted. We didn't do anything on the secondary server.
>
> Patches to the operating system, postgres, another application?
PostgreSQL Common 10.23-6
>
>> Next day, After 18 hours all our queries from secondary servers started taking too much time. queries were working in 2 sec started taking 80 seconds. Almost all queries behaved the same way.
>>
>> After half an hour of outage we restarted all db servers and system back to normal.
>>
>> Still we are not able to understand the root case. We couldn't find any error log or fatal errors. During the incident, in one of the read server disks was full. We couldn't see any replication lag or query cancellation due to replication.
>
> You say that all queries started doing sequential scans, is that an assumption
> from queries being slow or did you capture plans for the queries which be
> compared against "normal" production plans?.
Queries were taking 20 ms started taking 60 seconds. So have done SQL analyse to understand about query plan. There we found that query planner taking seq scan instead in index scan.
I would like to add one ore point. A delete query were running in DB from 2 days for deleting around 80 million records.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>
--
*Solutions for Care Anywhere*
*dWise HealthCare IT Solutions Pvt.
Ltd.* | www.lifetrenz.com <http://www.lifetrenz.com>
*Disclaimer*:
The
information and attachments contained in this email are intended
for
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and
any attachments. The views expressed in this email are, unless
otherwise
stated, those of the author and not those of dWise HealthCare IT Solutions
or its management.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Catherine Frock | 2024-11-20 14:23:39 | Re: Help with restoring database from old version of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | felix.quintgz | 2024-11-20 14:06:30 | Re: Running docker in postgres, SHM size of the docker container in postgres 16 |