| From: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |
| Date: | 2006-12-27 22:35:24 |
| Message-ID: | C1B8433C.5E69C%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Having a mechanism that requires enormous DBA effort and where there
> is considerable risk of simple configuration errors that will be hard
> to notice may not be the best kind of "feature" :-).
Why not? It seems to have worked remarkably well for the market leader ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2006-12-28 00:08:02 | libnss_pgsql? anyone have it working? |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-12-27 20:57:06 | Re: Is PostgreSQL for this? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-27 22:44:16 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-12-27 22:27:00 | Re: pg_hba.conf hostname todo |