From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c |
Date: | 2020-06-01 08:39:45 |
Message-ID: | C1904F65-8540-4137-AA88-F540D8612CBC@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 1 Jun 2020, at 08:06, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The problem I have with first and second flavors is that "DH
> parameters files" does not sound right. First, the grammar sounds
> incorrect to me as in this case "parameters" should not be plural.
I think "parameters" is the right term here, as the shared secret is determines
a set of Diffie-Hellman parameters.
> Second, it is only possible to load one file with ssl_dh_params_file,
> and we only attempt to load this single file within initialize_dh().
Thats correct, this is a leftover from when we allowed for different DH sizes
and loaded the appropriate file. This was removed in c0a15e07cd718cb6e455e683
in favor of only using 2048.
> Of course it would be possible to just switch to "DH parameter file"
> in the first part of the sentence, but I have just finished by
> rewriting the whole thing, as the third flavor.
I don't have a problem with the existing wording of the first sentence, and I
don't have a problem with your suggestion either (as long as it's parameters in
plural).
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-06-01 08:44:17 | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-06-01 08:33:12 | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |