| From: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand |
| Date: | 2016-05-19 22:26:22 |
| Message-ID: | C17C1C95-AF40-443A-A80F-31A5E6ABA5F9@endpoint.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On May 19, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
>> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
>> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible
>> change, but that's what major releases are for no?
>
> After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.
Yeah, if that’s the only practical difference, WORKSFORME; I can see the point about boxing us into a corner at some future time.
+1.
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com
785-727-1171
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-05-19 23:33:15 | To-Do item: skip table scan for adding column with provable check constraints |
| Previous Message | Евгений Шишкин | 2016-05-19 22:24:39 | Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand |