Re: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent
Date: 2006-11-08 05:00:19
Message-ID: C176A463.604D%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki,

On 11/7/06 1:51 AM, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> I don't think Simon's proposal is meant to address that issue, but did
> you follow the thread I started in September about Block B-Tree index:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg02041.php

Aha - mystery solved - thanks for the clarification.

Block Btree ~= Lossy Btree

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2006-11-08 05:34:16 string_to_array eats too much memory?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-11-08 01:23:55 Re: Uncleared result sets in describeOneTableDetails()