From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, S McGraw <smcg4191(at)mtneva(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Date: | 2016-01-24 22:42:18 |
Message-ID: | C14ACB7A-FA92-4145-969F-935F06489FC9@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> O.k. now I am starting to see your point. For example:
o_O
> Pg person A is harassing person B in the Rails community.
>
> How do we deal with that?
>
> 1. If person B is not in the Pg community then it is up to the Rails community to deal with it.
>
> 2. If person B is in the Pg community they can request help.
>
> I am open to wording on #2. I tried a couple of times but had trouble not making it a larger declaration that I think it needs to be.
How do you define “in the Pg community”? Is it someone who has posted to a known forum at least once? Someone who has been to a conference? What if they have never participated in a community forum, but use PostgreSQL at work? Maybe they would eventually submit a bug report or ask a question. How do you gauge that?
Me, I don’t think you can. If someone reports abusive behavior by a member of the Pg community, it should not matter whether or not the person doing the reporting is a member of the community, only that the reported abuser is.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2016-01-24 22:48:29 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2016-01-24 22:41:25 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |