| From: | "Dorochevsky,Michel" <michel(dot)dorochevsky(at)softcon(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock ob ject |
| Date: | 2007-04-21 16:30:02 |
| Message-ID: | C12B71B21705A04C9B9C3E9300430CAFA9701C@jupiter.softcon-its.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Von: Tom Lane [mailto:...]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 20. April 2007 18:14
> An: Dorochevsky,Michel
> Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock
object
>
> "Dorochevsky,Michel" <michel (dot) dorochevsky (at) softcon (dot) de>
writes:
> > Two runs of the same test program fail at different places, so it seems
to
> > be dependent of the timing. Two log files are available at
> > www.dorochevsky.de/infos/postgresql-2007-04-20_145638.zip
> > www.dorochevsky.de/infos/postgresql-2007-04-20_144006.zip
>
> Hm, could you try again with log_line_prefix set to '%m %p ' rather than
> just %t? It's too hard to guess which messages are coming from which
> backend ...
>
> regards, tom lane
Took me a number of tries, here it is
www.dorochevsky.de/infos/pg_log-2007-04-21_1811.zip
Best Regards
-- Michel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-21 18:30:32 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock ob ject |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-04-20 17:34:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore: error code 298 |