Re: a few thoughts on the schedule

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a few thoughts on the schedule
Date: 2015-05-19 03:34:16
Message-ID: C121EEAA-EAEE-42E9-AEE5-A1FE64F9AAB2@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 18, 2015, at 10:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> On 2015-05-19 11:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> +1 for moving it at least 1 month.
>
> 2015-06-15 also collides with pgcon, which probably isn't the best
> idea. I do think we should try hard doing a triage at the start of a CF
> and not many with experience in the project are going to have time
> around then.
>
> So, to where do we move it? We probably need to schedule at least the
> first CF now. Just to 2015-07-15? That'd leave us enough room to
> schedule the rest at pgcon.

Honestly, that seems awful soon. I would have thought maybe August 15th.

I am inclined to think the 5-CommitFest thing we did this time did not work out. It might've been fine if feature freeze had been a month earlier, but by freezing in May we've pretty clearly stolen at least a month, if not two, from the next cycle.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-19 03:36:10 Re: collations in shared catalogs?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-19 03:32:46 Re: collations in shared catalogs?