Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release

From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release
Date: 2006-08-31 17:30:48
Message-ID: C11D52E0.4BD3E%pgsql@007Marketing.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 1/9/2006 1:45, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Shane Ambler wrote:
>> I'd expand that to -
>>
>> With the continued success of our community project site
>> www.pgfoundry.org we also have the following projects developing
>> additional add-on features to offer expanded functionality to what is
>> included in the main PostgreSQL release. These features may be too
>> cutting edge to be considered part of the main project or may just
>> cater to a small market.
>
> This creates exactly the wrong impression that pgfoundry is for things
> of lower quality.

There is a difference between low quality and early development stage.

As suggested the last sentence is probably not necessary. Unless we can
think of a better way to describe what is there, early development/limited
testing, small target audience.

Maybe just - These features are developed by groups outside of the main
development team.

--

Shane Ambler
Postgres(at)007Marketing(dot)com

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-08-31 17:42:37 Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2006-08-31 17:28:23 Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD