| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 06:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | C0F8337E.2D3AC%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David,
On 8/3/06 11:02 PM, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> * Splitting queries among CPUs--possibly even among machines--for OLAP
> loads
>
> * In-place upgrades (pg_upgrade)
>
> * Several varieties of replication, which I believe we as a project
> will eventually endorse and ship
>
> * CALL
>
> * WITH RECURSIVE
>
> * MERGE
>
> * Windowing functions
>
> * On-the-fly in-line calls out to PL/your_choice without needing to
> issue DDL
My ordering of this list in terms of priority is:
1) Windowing functions
2) MERGE
3) Index only access (new)
4) In-place upgrades
We already have splitting queries among CPUs and machines.
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-08-04 06:20:48 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-08-04 06:02:35 | Re: 8.2 features status |