Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
Date: 2023-09-09 02:25:30
Message-ID: C0F1F23F-3F32-4B64-A31C-9FC92BE41A3F@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This looks mostly fine to me modulo "sort or hash". I do see many
> instances of "and/or" in the docs. Maybe that would work better.

"sort or hash operations at the same time" is clear explanation IMO.

This latest version of the patch looks good to me.

Regards,

Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-09-09 03:24:18 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-09-09 01:33:14 Re: Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases