| From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Postgresql Replication? |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 21:14:29 |
| Message-ID: | C0B560CD.43D9F%pgsql@007Marketing.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/6/2006 4:37, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:51:23PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 12:51, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:35:44PM -0400, Wei Weng wrote:
>>>> Is there any OSS solutions (stable) for postgresql replication for
>>>> postgresql 8.0?
>>>
>>> Slony, pgmirror, and I think there's another one.
>>> google:postgresql replication
>>
>> pgpool does syncrhonous query level replication, in addition to
>> connection pooling. It also makes a good front end to slony.
>
> There's also PITR, depending on your needs...
Also look at pgcluster - you can find it at
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-06-13 21:23:56 | Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully implementing |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-06-13 20:40:54 | Re: Short circuit evaluation of expressions in query |