Re: bug fix and documentation improvement about vacuumdb

> On 20 Sep 2023, at 11:46, Kuwamura Masaki <kuwamura(at)db(dot)is(dot)i(dot)nagoya-u(dot)ac(dot)jp> wrote:

> I think that supporting pattern matching is quite nice.
> But it will be not only tough but also a breaking change, I wonder.
> So I guess this change should be commited either way.

I agree. Supporting pattern matching should, if anyone is interested in
trying, be done separately in its own thread, no need to move the goalposts
here. Sorry if I made it sound like so upthread.

> The attached patch includes new tests for this bug.
> Also, I fixed the current test for -N option seems to be incorrect.

When sending an update, please include the previous patch as well with your new
tests as a 0002 patch in a patchset. The CFBot can only apply and build/test
patches when the entire patchset is attached to the email. The below
testresults indicate that the patch failed the new tests (which in a way is
good since without the fix the tests *should* fail), since the fix patch was
not applied:

http://cfbot.cputube.org/masaki-kuwamura.html

--
Daniel Gustafsson