| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Juan Casero (FL FLC)" <Juan(dot)Casero(at)wholefoods(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
| Date: | 2006-04-06 00:49:21 |
| Message-ID: | C059B3A1.20F09%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Juan,
On 4/5/06 5:33 PM, "Juan Casero (FL FLC)" <Juan(dot)Casero(at)wholefoods(dot)com>
wrote:
> ... but I am looking to see if the performance
> benefit we can get from this server is worth the price tag right now.
While many people here will look forward to performance results on the
T2000, I can guarantee that your server money will go much further for a
reporting application with an Opteron based system. Buy a Sun Galaxy with a
pair of Opteron 275s, run Linux on it, and I predict you will see
performance 4-5 times faster than the T2000 running Solaris for handling
single queries, and 2-3 times faster when handling multiple queries.
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcelo Tada | 2006-04-06 01:11:32 | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
| Previous Message | Juan Casero (FL FLC) | 2006-04-06 00:33:49 | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |