From: | Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
Cc: | mike <mike(at)thegodshalls(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: invalid UTF-8 byte sequence detected |
Date: | 2006-03-16 06:49:38 |
Message-ID: | C03E66A2.20DC8%wespvp@syntegra.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 3/16/06 12:41 AM, "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> wrote:
> I hope you didn't take my comments as a suggestion: I think you
> *should* preprocess your data and use UTF8 as the default encoding
> (or another encoding that includes all of the characters you hope to
> use) for your database.
Yeah, after thinking about it some more, it probably isn't such a good idea
- it would make the database act rather strange with non U.S. Data. I
really hate to have to burn the cycles to validate anything that looks like
extended UTF-8 characters, only to have Postgres do it again. But maybe
there's no choice.
Wes
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-03-16 08:36:40 | Re: question about postgresql time intervals |
Previous Message | Harald Armin Massa | 2006-03-16 06:41:44 | Re: PostgreSQL on Windows not starting |