From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down |
Date: | 2006-02-19 21:29:51 |
Message-ID: | C01E234F.1CD0B%llonergan@greenplum.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FYI - as a positive enhancement, Greenplum donated a beefy server to host
pgFoundry.
- Luke
On 2/18/06 10:34 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
>>> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
>>> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
>
>> I've repeatedly asked for help moving my PL/Java stuff over to pgfoundry and
>> offered my help
>> in the process,
>
> Indeed, we haven't made any particular effort to encourage gborg
> projects to move. I think it's a bit premature to hold a gun to
> their heads.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-19 21:35:56 | Re: Domains and supporting functions |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 21:29:35 | Re: Domains and supporting functions |