Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "Mike Biamonte" <mike(at)dbeat(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Date: 2006-01-31 17:00:30
Message-ID: C004D7AE.1B5A7%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jim,

On 1/30/06 12:25 PM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:

> Why divide by 2? A good raid controller should be able to send read
> requests to both drives out of the mirrored set to fully utilize the
> bandwidth. Of course, that probably won't come into play unless the OS
> decides that it's going to read-ahead fairly large chunks of the table
> at a time...

I've not seen one that does, nor would it work in the general case IMO. In
RAID1 writes are duplicated and reads come from one of the copies. You
could alternate read service requests to minimize rotational latency, but
you can't improve bandwidth.

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin 2006-01-31 17:25:39 Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Previous Message 2386429 2006-01-31 16:24:30 Delete me