From: | "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <bob(dot)basques(at)ci(dot)stpaul(dot)mn(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses |
Date: | 2020-05-13 14:18:24 |
Message-ID: | BY5PR09MB4737E536FC48EA3799630BDAF7BF0@BY5PR09MB4737.namprd09.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yup, that's where I was going with the USNG use.
Separate dataset bound to addresses where needed/desired for detailed locating. And where no address is present, the USNG becomes the address.
Bobb
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:01 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses
Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) wrote:
> Was wondering if you ever thought about binding the textual address to
> a USNG location. https://usngcenter.org/
Bobb, et al.:
Why not have a 'parent' table with entries such as 'Foo Farm' and a 'child'
table with rows for sub-parts of the parent; e.g., 'Barn', 'Field'?
Rich
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-13 14:45:35 | Re: Create user mapping for role |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-13 14:15:42 | Re: ESQL/C: a ROLLBACK rolls back a COMMITED transaction |