Re: psql 8 warm standby strong start, weak finish

From: Charlton Galvarino <charlton(at)2creek(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql 8 warm standby strong start, weak finish
Date: 2015-04-30 14:42:14
Message-ID: BY2PR0101MB149429C117B4A12451704452FCD60@BY2PR0101MB1494.prod.exchangelabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>Hmm, in newer versions of rsync --remove-sent-files has been replaced by --
>remove-source-files, so I cannot test. Some searching found that --remove-
>sent-files will move/delete unfinished files. I would say that the above cron
>command is dangerous. To test, comment out the command and let the

Great idea. Will do and let it run for a few days.

>archiving run. Postgres will recycle WALs on its own when they are no longer
>needed. Or is there is some compelling reason you want to get rid of WALs?

Ah. I didn't know that. I thought the cleanup was on me. Bonus!

Thanks for the help.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2015-04-30 14:43:46 Re: psql 8 warm standby strong start, weak finish
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2015-04-30 14:40:26 Re: psql 8 warm standby strong start, weak finish