Re: Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster)

From: Jaime Solorzano <jaisol(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster)
Date: 2021-09-23 22:10:21
Message-ID: BN3PR04MB2370843B65C3D8FF9CE21A69DDA39@BN3PR04MB2370.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks !

________________________________
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 03:56 PM
To: Jaime Solorzano <jaisol(at)hotmail(dot)com>; pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster)

On 9/23/21 12:57 PM, Jaime Solorzano wrote:
> According to the WAL Point-in-time recovery and incremental backup
> documentation, pg_basebackup and wals are used to take backups and
> incremental backups of a running PostgreSQL cluster.
>
>
> I wonder if there is a way to take incremental backups per database
> instead of the entire cluster.

You already know the answer to that:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69304047/postgres-incremental-backups-per-db-not-per-cluster

>
>
> Thanks !
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Lewis 2021-09-24 04:55:29 Re: Faster distinct query?
Previous Message Jaime Solorzano 2021-09-23 22:10:00 Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster)