From: | Jaime Solorzano <jaisol(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster) |
Date: | 2021-09-23 22:10:21 |
Message-ID: | BN3PR04MB2370843B65C3D8FF9CE21A69DDA39@BN3PR04MB2370.namprd04.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks !
________________________________
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 03:56 PM
To: Jaime Solorzano <jaisol(at)hotmail(dot)com>; pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster)
On 9/23/21 12:57 PM, Jaime Solorzano wrote:
> According to the WAL Point-in-time recovery and incremental backup
> documentation, pg_basebackup and wals are used to take backups and
> incremental backups of a running PostgreSQL cluster.
>
>
> I wonder if there is a way to take incremental backups per database
> instead of the entire cluster.
You already know the answer to that:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69304047/postgres-incremental-backups-per-db-not-per-cluster
>
>
> Thanks !
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Lewis | 2021-09-24 04:55:29 | Re: Faster distinct query? |
Previous Message | Jaime Solorzano | 2021-09-23 22:10:00 | Postgres incremental backups per db (not per cluster) |