| From: | Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Timezone and Brazilian DST |
| Date: | 2015-10-28 19:43:26 |
| Message-ID: | BLU436-SMTP1250D5073BA3FFCE078437ACF210@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks, Tom.
I'll play a bit with this in a development server.
Regards,
Atenciosamente,
Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
Em 28/10/2015 12:06, Tom Lane escreveu:
> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
>> No, if the above does not indicate a problem, then the issue is
>> probably, as Francisco said, in the timezone definitions. The thing is,
>> you are on 9.3.10 which has the latest time zone data file:
> Since OEL is a naked ripoff of Red Hat, I would assume that they configure
> Postgres the same way Red Hat does, ie --with-system-tzdata. So what will
> matter in that respect is whether your "tzdata" package is up to date, not
> which PG version you're running.
>
> However, AFAICT the spring DST transition rule in Brazil hasn't changed
> since 2008 or so, so it seems rather unlikely that anybody would have
> tzdata old enough for that to be a problem.
>
> I'm betting the OP simply didn't have Postgres' timezone parameter set
> properly. Yes, that can be fixed with a reload (as a moment's
> experimentation would have shown).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edson Richter | 2015-10-28 19:45:21 | Re: PostgreSQL Timezone and Brazilian DST |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-10-28 19:20:40 | Re: Waiting on ExclusiveLock on extension 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 |