From: | "Amber" <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
Date: | 2008-09-09 11:59:49 |
Message-ID: | BLU139-DS5AB90A6E11E3F439F0006CD540@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
I read something from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/projects/monetdb/SQL/Benchmark/TPCH/index.html saying that PostgreSQL can't give the correct result of the some TPC-H queries, I wonder is there any official statements about this, because it will affect our plane of using PostgreSQL as an alternative because it's usability. BTW I don't think PostgreSQL performances worse because the default configuration usually can't use enough resources of the computer, as as memory.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | justin | 2008-09-09 12:32:31 | Re: Automated Backup On Windows |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-09-09 09:31:40 | Re: Postgres in a solaris zone - patch 125077-02 needed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-09-09 12:39:47 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
Previous Message | Matt Smiley | 2008-09-09 08:06:17 | Re: too many clog files |