Re: What does 'elapsed' exact means in PostgreSQL Log Statistics

From: Camilo Porto <camiloporto(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What does 'elapsed' exact means in PostgreSQL Log Statistics
Date: 2007-10-04 16:20:34
Message-ID: BLU111-W56EF7037AC40B5DE03233BCA80@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Camilo Porto]

> From: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What does 'elapsed' exact means in PostgreSQL Log Statistics
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:43:24 -0700
> CC: camiloporto(at)hotmail(dot)com
>
> Camilo,
>
> > My Scenario is like this:
> >
> > PostgreSQL 7.4 with the following parameters:
>
> If you're testing performance, why are you using a 4-year-old version of
> PostgreSQL?

The problem persist with PostgreSQL v 8.2

>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco

_________________________________________________________________
Veja mapas e encontre as melhores rotas para fugir do trânsito com o Live Search Maps!
http://www.livemaps.com.br/index.aspx?tr=true

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-04 16:35:29 Re: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2007-10-04 15:52:50 tsearch2 wrapper