Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel

From: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel
Date: 2012-12-03 14:56:20
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP83AC8AD1C2D3E2CC096704DC400@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12-12-03 09:48 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2012-12-03 09:35:55 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>> On 12-12-03 07:42 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Yes that is exactly what I'md doing. Using a real database name
>> instead makes this go away.
> Was using "replication" an accident or do you think it makes sense in
> some way?

The 'replication' line in pg_hba.conf made me think that the database
name had to be replication for walsender connections.

> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-12-03 14:59:11 Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-03 14:48:10 Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel