| From: | Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Date: | 2011-06-24 12:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP695129D4A93A996B7621B28E520@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11-06-24 12:41 AM, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
>
> The logic that not use pg_stop_backup() would be difficult,
> because pg_stop_backup() is used to identify minRecoveryPoint.
>
Considering everything that has been discussed on this thread so far.
Do you still think your patch is the best way to accomplish base backups
from standby servers?
If not what changes do you think should be made?
Steve
> --------------------------------------------
> Jun Ishizuka
> NTT Software Corporation
> TEL：045-317-7018
> E-Mail: ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2011-06-24 12:53:51 | Re: debugging tools inside postgres |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-06-24 12:08:28 | Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix |