From: | Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Diferences between IN and EXISTS? |
Date: | 2013-02-04 15:52:07 |
Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP3385CFAA66532FB6E41732CF010@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Em 04/02/2013 07:35, zeljko escreveu:
> Edson Richter wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Assumptions: PostgreSQL 9.2.2, Win64, already run vacumm full freeze
>> analyze. No problems in the database. I know there are 1247 records to
>> be found.
>> Why does these queries return different results:
>>
>>
>> select count(*) from parcela
>> where id not in (select parcela_id from cadastroservicoparcela);
> I'm always using
> WHERE NOT id in (blabla) and never had such problems.
There relevant portion of the problem is here:
|IN|predicate (unlike|EXISTS|) is trivalent, i. e. it can
return|TRUE|,|FALSE|or|NULL|:
* |TRUE|is returned when the non-|NULL|value in question is found in
the list
* |FALSE|is returned when the non-|NULL|value is not found in the
list/and the list does not contain|NULL|values/
* |NULL|is returned when the value is|NULL|, or the non-|NULL|value is
not found in the list/and the list contains at least one|NULL|value/
The 3rd point is the one I was hitting.
Edson
>
> zeljko
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-02-04 16:06:29 | Re: Adding PRIMARY KEY: Table contains duplicated values |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-02-04 15:29:38 | Re: Adding PRIMARY KEY: Table contains duplicated values |