Re: PL/java

From: Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/java
Date: 2020-12-07 22:10:01
Message-ID: BLAPR19MB4227746DC4A48B47D2CB09DDAECE0@BLAPR19MB4227.namprd19.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Nota Bene:
Almost all official interfaces to/from Oracle are coded in Java
FWIK google's implementations are 95% python
(although you would need to understand JSON formatting for import/export requirements)
for those reasons i tread lightly before disparaging either language

Going Forward:
try to implement PL/SQL that rob/joshua mentioned
if you're calling no-joy after implementing PL/SQL
then we can take a look at interfacing to Postgres ETL binaries with a JNI interface
provided the JNI is spot on with signatures for each referenced function

Un Saludo
m

________________________________
From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/java

On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
>> Java is not meant to interact with databases.
>
> The JDBC folks might disagree.
>
That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app. As it should be.

In response to

Responses

  • Re: PL/java at 2020-12-07 22:22:31 from Rob Sargent
  • Re: PL/java at 2020-12-08 10:46:28 from David Goodenough

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2020-12-07 22:22:31 Re: PL/java
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-12-07 21:40:02 Re: Deferrable FK not behaving as expected.