RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512

From: "Amonson, Paul D" <paul(dot)d(dot)amonson(at)intel(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Shankaran, Akash" <akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Matthias van de Meent" <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512
Date: 2024-03-25 15:20:19
Message-ID: BL1PR11MB53043014C10F2D30B4231F9ADC362@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 8:12 AM
> To: Amonson, Paul D <paul(dot)d(dot)amonson(at)intel(dot)com>
> Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>; Nathan Bossart
> Subject: Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512
>...
> Just for a note --- the cfbot will re-test existing patches every so often without
> needing a bump. The current cycle period seems to be about two days.
>
> regards, tom lane

Good to know! Maybe this is why I thought it originally passed CI and suddenly this morning there is a failure. I noticed at least 2 other patch runs also failed in the same way.

Thanks,
Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-03-25 15:21:21 Re: add AVX2 support to simd.h
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-03-25 15:16:54 Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.