From: | "Alexandra Birch" <alexandra(at)trymedia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: limit 1 and functional indexes |
Date: | 2004-01-29 15:02:06 |
Message-ID: | BJELKOAELOIHMLJIEGHJOEAAEOAA.alexandra@trymedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
> >
> > Postgres choses the wrong index when I add limit 1 to the query.
> > This should not affect the index chosen.
>
> I don't know the complete answer to your question, but since no one else
> has commented I will answer what I can.
Thanks - your reply is apreciated :)
> It IS reasobable for the planner to choose a different plan when you
> add a LIMIT clause to a query.
OK - I'll investigate this further.
> > I read that functional indexes are sometimes not chosen correctly by
> > optimizer.
>
> I don't believe there are any particular problems with functional indexes.
> The opitmizer isn't perfect and will sometimes choose poor plans.
OK - but there was some discussion about statistics for functional indexes, for eg:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-01/msg00978.php
This does not help me solve my problem though :)
> > Is there anything I can do to always use the functional index in the
> > following queries?
>
> Have you done an ANALYZE of the table recently?
Yip - I should have said we do a daily VACUUM ANALYZE.
> It might be useful to see the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, rather than just
> the EXPLAIN output, as that will give the actual times needed to do
> the various steps.
I thought the cost values would be enough from the EXPLAIN alone.
And the query takes so long to run :(
Here is the output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE first with limit 1 then without:
explain analyze
select code
from transactions
where UPPER(pop) = UPPER('79bcdc8a4a4f99e7c111111111111111')
order by order_date DESC LIMIT 1;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..332.44 rows=1 width=33) (actual time=377745.75..377745.75 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using transactions_date_aff on transactions (cost=0.00..982549.96 rows=2956 width=33) (actual
time=377718.61..377718.61 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (upper((pop)::text) = '79BCDC8A4A4F99E7C111111111111111'::text)
Total runtime: 378439.32 msec
explain analyze
select code
from transactions
where UPPER(pop) = UPPER('79bcdc8a4a4f99e7c111111111111111')
order by order_date DESC;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Sort (cost=11824.16..11831.55 rows=2956 width=33) (actual time=248.17..248.17 rows=0 loops=1)
Sort Key: order_date
-> Index Scan using transactions_pop_i on transactions (cost=0.00..11653.79 rows=2956 width=33) (actual time=126.13..126.13
rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (upper((pop)::text) = '79BCDC8A4A4F99E7C111111111111111'::text)
Total runtime: 248.25 msec
Thank you,
Alexandra
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-01-29 15:11:46 | Re: limit 1 and functional indexes |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-01-29 12:52:40 | Re: limit 1 and functional indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-01-29 15:11:46 | Re: limit 1 and functional indexes |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2004-01-29 15:01:59 | How to retrieve N lines of a text field. |