| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Date: | 2006-01-14 21:55:17 |
| Message-ID: | BFEF23C5.3B98%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 14/1/06 21:49, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Dave,
>
>>> For those of you who haven't seen Hyperic, think of Nagios with a fancy
>>> web UI including notification management, scheduled tasks, historical
>>> reporting, and specific monitioring tools for PostgreSQL databases and
>>> other common applications. As a comparison, Nagios::Hyperic -->
>>> ed::vi or amanda::Arkieka
>>
>> Which is all very nice but what would any of those features give us that we
>> have any use for?
>
> Hey, it's your bag ... if you don't want it, I won't ask about setting it up.
OK, well unless anyone else disagrees - thanks, but no thanks. I honestly
can't see what we would gain.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-01-15 02:43:08 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-14 21:49:58 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |