Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Jignesh Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: "Juan Casero" <caseroj(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Date: 2005-12-19 19:37:15
Message-ID: BFCC4BEB.16CE3%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jignesh,

On 12/19/05 11:29 AM, "Jignesh Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> wrote:

> I have gone to the max with 4 fibers on Sun Fire T2000. But I am not sure
> about the answers that you asked. Let me see if I can get answers for them. I
> am going to try to max out the IO on these systems with 8 fibers as soon as I
> get additional storage so stay tuned for that.

Cool - how close did you get to 800MB/s?

> By the way you don't have to wait for my tests. Just get a trial server and
> try it on your own. If you don't like it return it.
>
> https://www.sun.com/emrkt/trycoolthreads/contactme.html

Done - I'll certainly test Postgres / Bizgres on it - you know me ;-)

> However if you do try it with PostgreSQL, do let me know also with your
> experience.

See above.

The Niagara is UltraSparc III compatible - so the GCC compiler should emit
good code for it, right?

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anjan Dave 2005-12-19 20:04:24 separate drives for WAL or pgdata files
Previous Message Jignesh Shah 2005-12-19 19:29:58 Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1