| From: | Sam Halliday <sam(dot)halliday(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields |
| Date: | 2009-04-27 15:37:25 |
| Message-ID: | BFC58AD4-B909-43F7-B1F2-DE561C0D2604@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think Sam Mason's proposal of hacking pg-pool sounds feasible. Is
there any way to create a formal RFE for this? Is anybody interested
in implementing this?
On 27 Apr 2009, at 13:55, Sam Mason wrote:
> One possible arrangement would be if each user/encryption key had its
> own database cluster. If that's OK, then maybe you could hack pg-pool
> around so that once it received the secret it would be able to run
> off,
> mount the appropriate partitions, and start the database engine before
> connecting to it. I've not used pg-pool before, but have a feeling
> that it can re-write queries on the fly so must have some non-trivial
> protocol knowledge--I may be wrong about that though.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-27 16:51:46 | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Previous Message | Werner Echezuria | 2009-04-27 15:19:33 | Re: To know what a macro does |