| From: | Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | NSO <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bytea poor performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-15 13:40:28 |
| Message-ID: | BF767F0C.10CEA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 10/15/05 9:20 AM, "NSO" <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to select form table with bytea field. And queries runs very
> slow.
> My table:
> CREATE TABLE files (file bytea, nr serial NOT NULL) WITH OIDS;
>
> Query:
> select * from files where nr > 1450
>
> (I have total 1500 records in it, every holds picture of 23kB size)
> Query runs very long:
> Total query runtime: 23625 ms.
> Data retrieval runtime: 266 ms.
> 50 rows retrieved.
>
> explain:
> Index Scan using pk on files (cost=0.00..3.67 rows=50 width=36)
> Index Cond: (nr > 1450)
>
> Is it possible to do something with it? or it is normal? Our server is
> fast, and all other tables work fine..
How about some explain analyze output? Have you done a full vacuum lately?
How about reindexing?
Sean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NSO | 2005-10-15 14:00:09 | Re: Bytea poor performance |
| Previous Message | NSO | 2005-10-15 13:20:54 | Bytea poor performance |