Tom,
On 8/29/05 6:41 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Interesting. I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
> SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
> that it's measured in pages).
I don't know, but I agree that the behavior has changed from Panther to
Tiger.
I wish BSD/Apple would go the way of Solaris 10 and be dynamic. This
ipc/shmem limits business has been a plague since its introduction.
- Luke