| From: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL mailing lists" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index scan optimization |
| Date: | 2014-11-18 04:10:58 |
| Message-ID: | BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB77158E60CCD@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 November 2014 16:05, Simon Riggs Wrote:
> I confirm 5% improvement in both short and long index scans, on the least beneficial datatype. Looks likely to be a very positive win overall.
Thanks a lot for testing and confirmation.
> The language used in the comments is not clear enough. I'll do my best to improve that, then look to commit this in about 5 hours.
Thanks a lot for support. Please let me know if I also need to add something.
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-11-18 04:37:24 | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |
| Previous Message | David G Johnston | 2014-11-18 01:41:30 | Re: vacuumdb: Help text for --analyze-only. |