From: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname" |
Date: | 2014-09-24 11:52:05 |
Message-ID: | BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB77158E53660@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 September 2014 17:15, Michael Paquier Wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> > than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> > patch to make it work either way. As far as I can see, it doesn't
> > break anything, not even if you have a data directory named "-D".
> +1. I forget it all the time as well...
+1, always I get confused once pg_controldata does not work with -D.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-09-24 11:59:19 | Re: better atomics - v0.6 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-09-24 11:51:10 | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |