| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |
| Date: | 2005-06-02 14:35:33 |
| Message-ID: | BEC46745.6CAF%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas,
>> Escape processing would proceed as before, but the semantics would change to
>> allow the use of different characters as the escape character, in addition
>> to the special characters for delimiter and newline.
>
> If you mean syntax to specify escape and delimiter (and newline ?),
> that is a great addition, that imho all would like.
Cool. We've found it invaluable with customers doing web data analysis.
> I don't see how that would be any advantage ? What is so wrong about having
> syntax to
> choose no escape processing, like "escape ''" ?
I agree.
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-02 14:54:57 | Re: Google's Summer of Code ... |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-06-02 14:33:13 | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |