Re: Vacuum time degrading

From: Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading
Date: 2005-03-08 15:44:21
Message-ID: BE530855.833C%wespvp@syntegra.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Well, the good news is that the 2.24.29 kernel solved the kswapd problem.
That bad news is that it didn't help the vacuum time. In fact, the vacuum
time is now over 6 hours instead of 5 hours. Whether that is a direct
result of the 2.24.29 kernel, or a coincidence, I don't know at this time.

I guess the next step is to try reindexing a couple of the big indexes and
see if that helps.

Wes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-03-08 15:47:29 Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison
Previous Message FERREIRA William (COFRAMI) 2005-03-08 15:23:37 Move cursor

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-08 16:52:39 Re: ERROR: unrecognized node type in PostgresMain( )
Previous Message Klaus Naumann 2005-03-08 13:57:59 Re: About b-tree usage