Re: Vacuum time degrading

From: Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading
Date: 2005-03-02 15:46:46
Message-ID: BE4B3C06.7E0C%wespvp@syntegra.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 2/28/05 6:53 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Again, VACUUM VERBOSE info would be informative (it's sufficient to look
> at your larger tables for this).

It took 5.2 hours again tonight to do the vacuum. I don't see anything out
of the ordinary - no explanation for the non-linear increases in vacuum
time.

This is what shows up at the end:

INFO: free space map: 93 relations, 282 pages stored; 1712 total pages
needed
DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 1000000 pages = 5920 kB shared
memory.

The tables all show something like:

INFO: "blah": found 0 removable, 366326534 nonremovable row versions in
3241829 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 0 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.

Wes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hemapriya 2005-03-02 16:06:48 pg_shadow passwd decrypt
Previous Message Frank Finner 2005-03-02 15:01:55 PL/Perl trusted throws error on example function

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2005-03-02 15:47:40 Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-03-02 15:41:57 Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent