Re: Vacuum time degrading

From: Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading
Date: 2005-03-01 16:22:43
Message-ID: BE49F2F3.7CD9%wespvp@syntegra.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 2/28/05 6:53 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> It's hard to see how the vacuum time wouldn't
> be linear in table size if there's nothing to do and no dead space.

I am doing 'vacuum analyze' rather than just 'vacuum'. Could that have
anything to do with the non-linear behavior?

Wes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2005-03-01 16:41:46 Re: row numbering
Previous Message Wes 2005-03-01 16:17:16 Re: Vacuum time degrading

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Hoffmann 2005-03-01 17:09:54 index file detached from data file
Previous Message Wes 2005-03-01 16:17:16 Re: Vacuum time degrading