Re: parallelizing the archiver

On 9/7/21, 11:38 PM, "Julien Rouhaud" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 6:36 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to gauge interest in parallelizing the archiver process.
>> [...]
>> Based on previous threads I've seen, I believe many in the community
>> would like to replace archive_command entirely, but what I'm proposing
>> here would build on the existing tools.
>
> Having a new implementation that would remove the archive_command is
> probably a better long term solution, but I don't know of anyone
> working on that and it's probably gonna take some time. Right now we
> have a lot of users that face archiving bottleneck so I think it would
> be a good thing to implement parallel archiving, fully compatible with
> current archive_command, as a short term solution.

Thanks for chiming in. I'm planning to work on a patch next week.

Nathan