Re: WIP: extensible enums

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date: 2010-08-23 21:34:12
Message-ID: BDB588B1-4AE2-4DD0-852A-AED8A10E5EA7@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I really don't see the value in making a command substantially less
>> intuitive in order to avoid a single keyword, unless it affects areas of
>> Postgres outside of this particular command.
>
> It's the three variants to do two things that I find unintuitive.

I strongly suspect that you are in the minority on this one.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-08-23 22:22:18 Re: Unable to drop role
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-08-23 21:30:04 Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)