Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2024-04-03 13:06:08
Message-ID: BDB24EC6-BF3D-4CA5-8FDD-3DD1B5D77298@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 3, 2024, at 8:54 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:

> Yes, I like the suggestion to make it require a restart, which lets the sysadmin control it and not limited to whatever the person who compiled it thought would make sense.

Or SIGHUP?

D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melih Mutlu 2024-04-03 13:12:49 Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-04-03 12:54:31 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions