From: | Sean Shanny <shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Getting an out of memory failure.... (long email) |
Date: | 2004-09-28 03:54:32 |
Message-ID: | BD7E58B8.19003%shannyconsulting@earthlink.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom,
We have been running pg_autovacuum on this entire DB so I did not even
consider that. I am running an analyze verbose now.
We should see about 82mm rows that will match the Filter: ((date_key >= 610)
AND (date_key <= 631))
I'll update in an hour or so.
--sean
On 9/27/04 11:49 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Sean Shanny <shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net> writes:
>> -> Seq Scan on f_pageviews t1 (cost=0.00..11762857.88
>> rows=1 width=8)
>> Filter: ((date_key >= 610) AND (date_key <= 631))
>
> How many rows are actually going to match that filter condition? (The
> symptoms seem to indicate that the answer is "a whole lot", not "1".)
>
> I speculate that you're overdue for an ANALYZE on this table, and that
> the planner thinks this scan is going to yield no rows because the
> stats it has say there are no rows with date_key >= 610.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Federico Balbi | 2004-09-28 05:54:03 | .net |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-28 03:49:47 | Re: Getting an out of memory failure.... (long email) |