| From: | "Plugge, Joe R(dot)" <JRPlugge(at)west(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum Tuning advice |
| Date: | 2010-03-01 12:57:58 |
| Message-ID: | BD69807DAE0CE44CA00A8338D0FDD08302CBEF55D5@oma00cexmbx03.corp.westworlds.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Sorry, this is a “black box” application, I am bound by what they give me as far as table layout, but I fully understand the rationale. I believe this application spent its beginnings with Oracle, which explains the blanket use of VARCHAR.
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz [mailto:gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 6:51 AM
To: Plugge, Joe R.
Cc: Scott Marlowe; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum Tuning advice
storing all fields as varchar surely doesn't make:
- indicies small,
- the thing fly,
- tables small.
...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-01 16:15:32 | Re: Query slowing down significantly?? |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2010-03-01 12:50:58 | Re: Autovacuum Tuning advice |