Re: Named Operators

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Named Operators
Date: 2023-07-04 13:11:37
Message-ID: BC91E4A8-1133-456B-9E58-AD4EEC0639DD@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Feb 2023, at 16:57, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I do not think this proposal is going anywhere as-written.

Reading this thread, it seems there is concensus against this proposal in its
current form, and no updated patch has been presented, so I will mark this as
Returned with Feedback. Please feel free to resubmit to a future CF when there
is renewed interest in working on this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-07-04 13:13:16 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-07-04 12:51:55 Re: Remove incidental md5() function uses from several tests