| From: | AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |
| Date: | 2006-08-13 02:44:13 |
| Message-ID: | BC5DA05E-4026-4EA5-AEC8-F20E7EAEF890@themactionfaction.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:01 , Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 07:22, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I am still waiting for someone to tell us that they would use this
>> capability for a real-world problem.
Notice that if you google "full disjunction" that the first link is
this project.
You won't find anyone to vouch for it because this is the first
implementation of full disjunctions in any database. That doesn't
mean it isn't useful- it means no one is using it because it hasn't
existed until now.
This is the point where one needs to decide whether PostgreSQL is a
copier of features from other databases or whether it can lead with a
few unique features of its own.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-13 03:02:22 | Re: SIg11 on suse linux |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-13 02:26:14 | Re: Buildfarm owners: check if your HEAD build is stuck |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-13 03:05:12 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-08-12 21:59:37 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |