From: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Akshay Mathur <akshay(dot)mathur(at)airtightnetworks(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sql function: using set as argument |
Date: | 2005-08-15 22:09:01 |
Message-ID: | BC5D7F44-C952-4FC5-AB6E-8A41B4EA8CC4@sitening.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Is there a reason not to build it in as a sub-query?
E.g., if you have a function get_count( int ):
SELECT count(b_column)
FROM some_table
WHERE some_field_1 in (
SELECT a_column
FROM a_table
WHERE some_condition
)
AND some_field_2 = $2;
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-469-5150
615-469-5151 (fax)
On Aug 10, 2005, at 9:30 AM, Akshay Mathur wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a function that returns a set.
>
> Looks like:
>
> Select a_column from a_table where some_condition;
>
>
>
> I want to use output of this function as an argument of another
> function
>
> Second looks like:
>
> Get_count(result_set_of_function_1, int)
>
> Select count(b_column) from
> some_table where some_field_1 in ($1) and some_field_2 = $2;
>
>
>
> Please suggest how can I do that?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> akshay
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Akshay Mathur
> SMTS, Product Verification
> AirTight Networks, Inc. (www.airtightnetworks.net)
>
> O: +91 20 2588 1555 ext 205
> F: +91 20 2588 1445
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sebastian Siewior | 2005-08-15 22:19:50 | Problem with a Pettern Matching Check |
Previous Message | Dario Bahena Tapia | 2005-08-15 16:34:32 | Re: Parentheses in FROM clause and evaluation order. |